After months of legal restrictions, Telegram founder Pavel Durov has regained the ability to travel freely, marking a turning point in his ongoing dispute with French authorities.
The case, which revolves around allegations that Telegram facilitated illicit activities, has raised broader concerns about digital privacy and the role of encrypted platforms.
While uncertainty remains over the legal proceedings, the market has responded positively, with Toncoin seeing a notable increase following the news.
Pavel Durov Leaves France After Months of Restriction
Since his arrest in August 2024, Pavel Durov had been unable to leave France, facing allegations that Telegram failed to implement sufficient safeguards against illegal activity.
French authorities claimed that the platform’s encryption and privacy policies contributed to the rise of fraudulent transactions and other unlawful activities. Despite securing bail shortly after his arrest, Durov was required to remain in the country while legal proceedings unfolded.
TON Foundation Celebrates Pavel Durov's Passport Return
— TON 💎 (@ton_blockchain) March 15, 2025
TON Foundation is delighted to learn that Pavel Durov's passport has been returned to him by French authorities, granting him the freedom to leave the country at his discretion.
This news marks a significant moment of… pic.twitter.com/KkNG7UnJBg
Now that his passport has been returned, Durov has reportedly travelled to Dubai. However, the decision to permit his departure does not necessarily indicate an end to the case, as legal uncertainties persist.
French prosecutors continue to push for a conviction that could result in a significant prison sentence and financial penalties.
Meanwhile, the situation has reignited discussions on the balance between digital privacy and regulatory oversight. Many view Durov’s charges as an attempt to weaken encrypted messaging services.
Telegram has already made adjustments in response to the scrutiny. The platform has updated its policies, introducing stricter measures for reporting illegal content.
While it remains committed to privacy, these changes suggest a shift in how Telegram approaches moderation and compliance with authorities. Whether this will affect the ongoing case remains to be seen.
France Denies Suppressing Free Speech Amid Ongoing Controversy
Following Durov’s arrest, concerns about digital freedom in France intensified, leading to accusations that the country was targeting encrypted messaging platforms.
These concerns were further amplified by statements from privacy advocates who saw the move as part of a broader effort to increase government control over online communication.
I have seen false information regarding France following the arrest of Pavel Durov.
— Emmanuel Macron (@EmmanuelMacron) August 26, 2024
France is deeply committed to freedom of expression and communication, to innovation, and to the spirit of entrepreneurship. It will remain so.
In a state governed by the rule of law,…
In response, French President Emmanuel Macron publicly addressed the issue, denying that the arrest was politically motivated.
He insisted that France remains committed to freedom of expression and that Durov’s detention was purely a legal matter, handled independently by the judiciary.
Macron’s statement emphasised that France upholds the rule of law and protects fundamental rights, both online and offline.
Despite this, many remain sceptical. Critics argue that the decision to detain Durov contradicts France’s claims of supporting digital freedom.
They highlight the broader implications of the case, suggesting that targeting the founder of a privacy-focused platform sends a concerning message about government interference in encryption and online speech.
The timing of Macron’s response also raises questions. His statement came only after widespread backlash and speculation, rather than at the time of Durov’s arrest.
This has led some to believe that the explanation was more about managing public perception than addressing the core issue of government overreach.
With the case still ongoing, France’s handling of the situation will likely continue to be scrutinised, particularly by those advocating for digital privacy and decentralised communication.
Conclusion
While Durov’s ability to leave France is a significant development, it does not mark the end of his legal challenges.
His case remains unresolved, with potential consequences for both Telegram and The Open Network.
The market reaction suggests optimism, but questions about regulatory scrutiny and the long-term viability of Toncoin remain. As the situation develops, it will serve as a key test for how governments approach privacy-focused platforms in an increasingly regulated digital landscape.